MegaCities are the Driving Force in Economic Development.In 1973, Richard J. Barnet and Ronald E. Mueller published Global Reach: The Power of the Multinational Corporations. The authors criticized the growth and power of Multinational Corporations and their role in the American expansion abroad in empire-building and colonization. They warned that multinational corporations are designed to exploit other nations. They would make advanced nations richer and poorer nations poorer. The authors advocated policies to curb U.S. corporations from expanding without limits.
Had their proposals gone into effect, the economically disadvantaged nations of the world would have grown poorer, not richer! In fact, less developed nations improve as the result of letting commerce and trade occur between the advanced and developing nations. Developing nations need capital and investment. Discouraging investment from flowing into needy nations is the way to keep them poor.
The real driver of economic growth is not nations as much as their megacities and urban centers. Most global economic activity takes place in the 600 largest urban centers – places like Beijing, London, Sao Paulo, Mexico City, Jakarta. Ten U.S. cities – NYC, San Francisco, Miami, Boston, Chicago, Dallas, Houston, Atlanta, LA, Seattle – account for a substantial amount of the U.S. GDP. The top European cities – London, Frankfurt, Berlin, Paris, Geneva, Milan – account for a good percentage of European GDP. Today 54% of India’s GDP is transacted in 10 cities. Three million Chinese are moving to cities every month!
If GDP is getting more and more concentrated in the megacities and their satellites, then marketing has to shift from mass marketing that focuses on national GDP to urban marketing that focuses on the megacity and its middle classes. These megacities and their satellites are globally interlocked in investment, trade and consumption.
Megacities can be viewed as “quasi-nations” or “city states.” Consider that in the 11th century, many cities, including Venice, Milan, Florence, Genoa, Pisa, Siena, Lucca, Cremona each became a large trading metropolis and operated with great independence.
Megacities have to form positive and mutually serving relations with several groups, including the national power, other global centers that act as rivals or allies, international organizations (World Bank, International Monetary Fund), major banks and multinational corporations. Major megacities must learn how to negotiate its various relationships and opportunities. One of the most important groups is the entrepreneurs and companies that can assist or oppose policies.
What role does a nation play when economic development is largely in the hands of its major urban cities? One can raise a more basic question. Why are nations needed? Can’t a group of major cities achieve their desires better without being part of a Nation. What is added by forming a nation which has the power to tax and then allocate resources among the communities according to political compromises and power blocks.
The answer is that nations create a set of benefits that otherwise would not be available to the separate megacities. The nation can shift resources from the richer communities to the weaker communities. We call this the redistributive function of national government. The nation also develops a history of exploits and leaders that give its people a sense of pride and purpose. We call this the heroic function of national government. We know how people in some nations call their nation the Fatherland (Germany) or the Motherland (Russia) to give identity and meaning to the lives of these people. And the nation serves another purpose, its defense function, in that individual cities would be subject to attack from rapacious outsiders and need to formally join with other communities into a nation that provides self-defense.
Sadly most of the world’s population over historical time has been oppressed by their national governments. Most European nations were run by a monarchy and aristocracy to serve their own interests. Most citizens lived under feudal and subsistence conditions, with little hope of advancing their well-being. The idea that the citizens of a nation should participate in determining its destiny—the idea of democracy—came to life 2000 years after Athenian democracy with the American and French Revolutions.
How do urban centers work out their own destinies? Clearly each urban center rallies its major power centers to work together toward a vision of urban growth. Its power centers include its major corporations, banks, hotels, media and community organizations. Each urban center forms relationships with the nation itself, other urban centers within the nation, feeder cities and resource pools in the nation, other nations and particularly other urban centers outside the nation, and international organizations.
What role is played by global corporations in selecting urban cities to work with? Global corporations moving into a new region of the world such as Asia first need to choose a nation and then an urban center within that nation to become its regional headquarters. Often in Asia, Hong Kong or Singapore would be chosen first because these cities had excellent transportation, telecommunications, banks, and services and also had a high degree of political stability. So the power of a major urban center to attract interest and resources from relevant major corporations is key to its urban growth, even more so than its work to wrest resources from its own nation.
Urban centers compete with each other to attract capital and resources. They compete by offering free land, tax rebates, quality of life, etc. Urban centers improve themselves by building high quality infrastructure – airports, highways, telecommunications, and electricity grids.
The bottom line is to give major urban centers the freedom, opportunity and incentive to build their own power and brand.
India is a good case in point of the economic power of megacities. My associate in India Dr. Virdur Sahgal sent me the following data.
The table below shows the population figures from the 2011 census of India of the top 20 cities which pretty much total up to the 7.5% mark.
The GDP figure of USD 1.848 trillion is correct. Population figure is 1.24 Billion currently.
So if the GDP figures for the top 15 cities are right then your contention that the top 15 cities contribute 56% of the GDP is a correct interpretation of the available data.
As far as I am concerned, I also am astonished at this conclusion and will be giving it some thought to analyze it through.
with respect & regards
Largest cities or towns of India
12,478,447 11 Lucknow
11,007,835 12 Kanpur
8,425,970 13 Nagpur
6,809,970 14 Indore
5,570,585 15 Thane
4,681,087 16 Bhopal
4,486,679 17 Visakhapatnam
4,462,002 18 Pimpri-Chinchwad
3,115,431 19 Patna
3,073,350 20 Ludhiana
+ + + + + + + + + +
Dr. Vidur Sahgal (B.Com(H), MBA & PhD)